MARi CPMF validation report

Five-factor privacy profiling from simulated personas.

Big Five persona robustness, Prev_CPMF/IUIPC grouping evidence, and a compressed adaptive question demo for the adopted five explanatory factors.

Simulation audit

Big Five templates reproduced stable target levels.

Each Big Five axis was expressed with high, middle, and low templates, then all axis-level combinations were scored with the IPIP-NEO-120 item battery.

Big Five grid3 levels

Items per persona120

Mean consistency85%

Range76%-96%

Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of research in personality, 51, 78-89.

Domain consistency

Five target axes

N NeuroticismMean score 44.0 / 100

84%

E ExtraversionMean score 51.2 / 100

84%

O OpennessMean score 49.5 / 100

89%

A AgreeablenessMean score 56.0 / 100

86%

C ConscientiousnessMean score 56.7 / 100

83%

Template tracking

Low, middle, high separation

N Neuroticism

Low7.9

Middle44.8

High79.5

E Extraversion

Low15.1

Middle49.6

High88.8

O Openness

Low11.0

Middle50.8

High86.7

A Agreeableness

Low20.4

Middle53.0

High94.5

C Conscientiousness

Low20.0

Middle52.3

High97.9